P., Mendelson A. L., Kurpius D. D. Public life and the internet: if you build a better website, will citizens become engaged? // New media & Society. 2008. Vol. 10. N 2. P. 179–201. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1177/1461444807086474.
Geir Flikke Conflicting Opportunities or Patronal Politics? Restrictive NGO Legislation in Russia 2012–2015 // Europe-Asia Studies. 2018. Vol. 70. N 4. P. 564–590. DOLio.1080/09668136.2018.1455806.
Ganapati S., Reddick C. G. The use of ICT for open government in U. S. Municipalities: perceptions of Chief Administrative Officers // Public performance & Management review. 2014. Vol. 37. № 3. P. 365–387. DOI: https://d01.org/10.2753/pmr1530-9576370302.
Goncharenko G., Khadaroo I. Disciplining human rights organisations through an accounting regulation: A case of the ‘foreign agents’ law in Russia // Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 2020. Vol. 72. P. 102–129.
Hofmann S. Just because we can – governments’ rationale for using social media // ECIS 2014 Proceedings, 2014.
Jakobson L., Koushtanina E. The Emergence of the Nonprofit Sector in the Sphere of Culture in Russia // The Journal of Arts, Management, Law and Society. 2000. Vol. 30. № 1.
Jho W., Song K. J. Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: Solo or duet? // Government Information Quarterly. 2015. Vol. 32. № 4. P. 488–495.
Kabanov Y., Sungurov A. E-Government development factors: evidence from the Russian regions // Chugunov A. V. (ed). Digital transformation and global society communications in computer and information science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. P. 85–95.
Kim S.-E. The Role of trust in the modern administrative state: an integrative model. Administration & Society. 2005. Vol. 37. № 5. P 611–635. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1177/0095399705278596.
Lee J., Kim S. Citizens’ e-participation on agenda setting in local governance: do individual social capital and e-participation management matter? Public management review. 2018. Vol. 20. № 6. P. 873–895. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1340507.
Lichfield N. Community Impact Evaluation: Principles And Practice. L.: Routledge, 2005. 384 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/978 0203991282.
Lorentzen P. L. Regularizing rioting: permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime // QJPS. 2013. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 127–158. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1561/100.00012051.
Malkova P. A qualitative study of the interaction between human rights defenders and society in Russia: Assessing the impact of the ‘foreign agents’ law Cosmopolitan Civil Societies // Interdisciplinary Journal. 2019. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 1–20.
Meijer A. E-governance innovation: barriers and strategies. Government information quarterly. 2015. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 198–206. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001.
Lunat Z. The internet and the public sphere: evidence from civil society in developing countries // The electronic journal of information systems in developing countries. 2008. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 1–12. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1002/j.1681–4835.2008.tb00240.x.
Norris D. F., Reddick C. G. E-democracy at the American grassroots: Not now… not likely? // Information polity. 2013. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 201–216. DOI: https://doi.org/io.3233/ip-i3°3i2.
Owen C. A. "Consentful Contention" in a Corporate State: Human Rights Activists and Public Monitoring Commissions in Russia // East European Politics. 2015. Vol. 31. № 3. P. 274–293.
Owen C. A. Genealogy of Kontrol’ in Russia: From Leninist to Neoliberal Governance // Slavic Review. 2016. Vol. 75. № 2. P. 331–353-
Perez-Morote R., Pontones-Rosa C., Nunez-Chicharro M. The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020. Vol. 154. DOI: https://dx.doi. org/io.ioi6/j.techfore.2020.H9973.
Royo S., Yetano A. "Crowdsourcing" as a tool for e-participation: two experiences regarding CO2 emissions at municipal level // Electron Commer Research. 2015. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 323–348. DOI: https:// d01.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9183-6.
Royo S., Yetano A., Acerete В. E-Participation and environmental protection: are local governments really committed? Public administration review. 2014. Vol. 74. № 1. P. 87–98. DOI: https://doi. org/io.nn/puar.12156.
Sachs M., Schossbbck J. Acceptance of tools for electronic citizen participation // Panagiotopoulos P. (ed.). Electronic participation lecture notes in computer science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. P. 35–46.
Seebo 0., Rose J., Skiftenes F. L. The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area // Government Information Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 25. № 3. P. 400–428.
Santamaria-Philco A., Canos Cerda J. H., Penades Gramaje M. C. Advances in e-Participation: a perspective of last years // IEEE Access. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 155894-155916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ access.2019.2948810.
Schlaufer C. Why do nondemocratic regimes promote E— participation? The case of Moscow’s active citizen online voting platform. Governance. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12531.
Sedova N. N. The formats, factors, and social base of civic activism in Today’s Russia // Sociological Research. 2015. Vol. 54. № 4. P. 284–306. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1080/10610154.2015.1123531.
Sobaci M. Z., Eryigit K. Y. Determinants of E-Democracy adoption in Turkish municipalities: an analysis for spatial diffusion effect. Local government studies. 2015. Vol. 41. № 3. P. 445–469. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/03003930.2014.995296.
Steinbach M. E-participation on the local level – A census survey approach for researching its implementation // Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2020. Vol. 17. № 1. P. 12–32.
Strata-Strelet D. et al. Critical factors in the institutionalization of e-participation in e-government in Europe: Technology or leadership? // Technological forecasting and social change. 2021. Vol. 164. P. 120489. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120489.
Sungurov A. Pietarin kansalais juarjestojen rakentamassa // Kansalaisyhteiskunta Liikkeessa Yli Rajojen (Гражданские контакты через границы) / Airi Leppanen (toin), Tampere: palme-nis-kustannus, 2005. P. 227–235.
Sweeney A. D. P. Electronic government-citizen relationships: exploring citizen perspectives // Journal of information technology & Politics. 2008. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 101–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.10 80/19331680802076165.
Parycek P., Rinnerbauer B., Schossbbck J. Democracy in the digital age: digital agora or dystopia // IJEG. 2017. Vol. 9. № 3–4. P. 185. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1504/ijeg.2017.088224.
The Oxford Handbook of Governance / ed. by D. Levi-Faur. Oxford, 2012.
Tolbert C. J., Mossberger K. The effects of E-Government on trust and confidence in government // Public administration review. 2006. Vol. 66. № 3. P. 354–369. DOI: https://d01.org/10.1111/j.1540-621 0.2006.00594.x.
Tysiachniouk M., Tulaeva S., Henry L. A. Civil society under the law ‘on foreign agents’: NGO strategies and network transformation // Europe-Asia Studies. 2018. Vol. 70. № 4. P. 615–637.
Van der Vet F. Holding on to Legalism: the Politics of Russian Litigation on Torture and Discrimination before the European Court of Human Rights // Social and Legal Studies. 2014. Vol. 23. № 3. P. 361–381.
Van der VetF., Lyytikainen L. Violence and human rights in Russia: how human rights defenders develop their tactics in the face of danger, 2005–2013 // The International Journal of Human Rights. 2015. Vol. 19. № 7. P. 979–998. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2015.1075306.
Wirtz
