R. L. Dantesque and Dostoevskian Motifs in Chekhov’s “In Exile” // Russian Literature. 1994. Vol. 35. № 2. P. 181–193.
Jackson 1997 – Jackson R. L. Библейские и литературные аллюзии в рассказе «Гусев» // Anton P. Čechov. Philosophische und religiöse Dimensionen im Leben und im Werk. Vorträge des Zweiten Internationalen Čechov-Symposiums, Badenweiler, 20.–24. Oktober 1994 / hrsg. von V. B. Kataev, R.-D. Kluge und R. Nohejl. München: Sagner, 1997. S. 419–426.
Jackson 2018 – Jackson R. L. A Fragment from the Aggregate: Sinai and Sakhalin in Chekhov’s Letters to Suvorin (to Alexei Suvorin, 9 March 1890; 9 December 1890; 17 December 1890) // Chekhov’s Letters: Biography, Context, Poetics / ed. by C. Apollonio and R. Lapushin. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2018. P. 271–275.
Kramer 1970 – Kramer K. D. The Chameleon and the Dream: The Image of Reality in Čexov’s Stories. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.
Lantz 1978 – Lantz K. A. Chekhov’s “Gusev”: A Study // Studies in Short Fiction. 1978. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 55–61.
Malcolm 2002 – Malcolm J. Reading Chekhov: A Critical Journey. New York: Random House, 2002.
Mathewson 1968 – Mathewson R. W. Intimations of Mortality in Four Chekhov’s Stories // American Contributions to the Sixth International Congress of Slavists, Prague, 1968, August 7–13. Vol. 2: Literary Contributions / ed. by W. E. Harkins. The Hague: Mouton, 1968. P. 261–283.
Maxwell 1973 – Maxwell D. A System of Symbolic Gesture in Čexov’s “Step’” // Slavic and East European Journal. 1973. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 146–154.
Meijer 1978 – Meijer J. M. Čechov’s Word // Eng J. van der, Meijer J. M., Schmid H. On the Theory of Descriptive Poetics: Anton P. Chekhov as StoryTeller and Playwright. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press, 1978. P. 99–143.
Nilsson 1968 – Nilsson N. Å. Studies in Čekhov’s Narrative Technique: “The Steppe” and “The Bishop”. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1968.
Nilsson 1982 – Nilsson N. Å. Tolstoj – Čechov – Babel: “Shortness” and “Syntax” in the Russian Short Story // Scando-Slavica. 1982. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 91–107.
O’Connor 2018a – O’Connor K. T. Anton Chekhov and D. H. Lawrence: The Art of Letters and the Discourse of Mortality // Chekhov’s Letters: Biography, Context, Poetics / ed. by C. Apollonio and R. Lapushin. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2018. P. 220–235.
O’Connor 2018b – O’Connor K. T. Chekhov’s Letter to Lermontov (to Mikhail Chekhov, from the ship Dir, 28 July 1888) // Ibid. P. 252–258.
Pitcher 2010 – Pitcher H. Responding to Chekhov: The Journey of a Lifetime. Cromer: Swallow House Books, 2010.
Rayfield 1999 – Rayfield D. Understanding Chekhov: A Critical Study of Chekhov’s Prose and Drama. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1999.
Remnick 2005 – Remnick D. Onward and Upward with the Arts: The Translation Wars // The New Yorker. 2005. 7 November. P. 98–125.
Rossbacher 1968 – Rossbacher P. Čexov’s Fragment “Solomon” // Slavic and East European Journal. 1968. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 27–34.
Rylkova 2018 – Rylkova G. Homo Sachaliensis // Chekhov’s Letters: Biography, Context, Poetics / ed. by C. Apollonio and R. Lapushin. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2018. P. 161–172.
Sadetsky 1997 – Sadetsky A. Polysemy/Homonymy: Interpreting the Centrifugally Directed Wholeness of the Chekhovian Word // Chekhov Then and Now: The Reception of Chekhov in World Culture / ed. by J. D. Clayton. New York: Peter Lang, 1997. P. 225–235.
Scherr 1986 – Scherr B. P. Russian Poetry: Meter, Rhythm, and Rhyme. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
M. Senderovich 1977 – Senderovich M. The Symbolic Structure of Chekhov’s Story “An Attack of Nerves” // Chekhov’s Art of Writing / ed. by P. Debreczeny and T. Eekman. Columbus: Slavica, 1977. P. 11–26.
M. S enderovich 1987 – Senderovich M. Chekhov’s Existential Trilogy // Anton Chekhov Rediscovered: A Collection of New Studies with a Comprehensive Bibliography / ed. by S. Senderovich and M. Sendich. East Lansing: Russian Language Journal, 1987. P. 77–91.
S. Senderovich 1987 – Senderovich S. Towards Chekhov’s Deeper Reaches // Ibid. P. 1–8.
S. Senderovich 1989 – Senderovich S. A Fragment of Semiotic Theory of Poetic Prose (The Chekhovian Type) // Essays in Poetics. 1989. Vol. 14. № 2. P. 43–64.
de Sherbinin 1997 – Sherbinin J. de. Chekhov and Russian Religious Culture: The Poetics of the Marian Paradigm. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997.
de Sherbinin 2006 – Sherbinin J. de. Chekhov and the Middle: Revisiting “The Lady with the Little Dog” // Anton Pavlovich Chekhov: Poetics – Hermeneutics – Thematics / ed. by J. D. Clayton. Ottawa: The Slavic Research Group at the University of Ottawa, 2006. P. 179–191.
Shrayer 1999 – Shrayer M. D. The World of Nabokov’s Stories. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1999. P. 91–137.
Smolin 2000 – Smolin L. Th ree Roads to Quantum Gravity. New York: Basic Books, 2001.
Struve 1961 – Struve G. On Chekhov’s Craft smanship: The Anatomy of a Story // Slavic Review. 1961. Vol. 20. № 3. P. 465–476.
Swift 2004 – Swift M. S. Biblical Subtexts and Religious Themes in Works of Anton Chekhov. New York: Peter Lang, 2004.
Winner 1966 – Winner T. Chekhov and His Prose. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.
Winner 1984 – Winner T. The Poetry of Chekhov’s Prose: Lyrical Structures in “The Lady with the Pet Dog” // Language and Literary Theory / ed. by B. Stolz, I. R. Titunik and L. Dolezel. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1984. P. 609–622.
Zubarev 1997 – Zubarev V. A System Approach to Literature: Mythopoetics of Chekhov’s Four Major Plays. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1997.
Примечания
1
«У зрелого Чехова в каждой вещи своя музыка», – пишет Сорока [Сорока 2016: 767]. О «музыкальности» прозы Чехова см. [Фортунатов 1971].
2
См. также [Кожевникова 2011: 334–348].
3
См. [Nilsson 1968: 62–70]; см. также [Фортунатов 1975: 67–109].
4
Этот термин последовательно используется З. С. Паперным при анализе драматургии Чехова. См. [Паперный 1982].
5
См. другие работы, посвященные различным аспектам поэтического в творчестве
