Книга Иллюзия закона. Истории про то, как незнание своих прав делает нас уязвимыми - Тайный адвокат

18. ‘Enemies of the people: Lord Chancellor Liz Truss says it would be dangerous to tell Daily Mail what to print’, Press Gazette, 1 March 2017, https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/enemies-of-the-people-lord-chancellor-liz-truss-says-it-would-bedangerous-to-tell-daily-mail-want-to-print/

19. G. Adams, ‘The judges and the people: Next week, 11 unaccountable individuals will consider a case that could thwart the will of the majority on Brexit. The Mail makes no apology for revealing their views – and many have links to Europe’, Daily Mail, 3 December 2016. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3995754/The-judges-people-week-11-unaccountableindividuals-consider-case-help-thwart-majority-Brexit-Mailmakes-no-apology-revealing-views-links-Europe.html

20. C. Hope, ‘Farage to lead 100,000-strong march on Supreme Court on day of historic Brexit court hearing’, Telegraph, 7 November 2016, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/06/nigel-farageto-lead-100000-strong-march-on-supreme-court-on-day/

21. ‘IAIN DUNCAN SMITH: Why it’s crucial that the judges who could decide the fate of Brexit ARE scrutinised’, Daily Mail, 7 December 2016.

22. J. Tapsfield, T. Sculthorpe and M. Dathan, ‘“There is NO turning back!” David Davis warns Remoaner MPs they will face the full wrath of the public if they use Supreme Court ruling to block Brexit’, Daily Mail, 24 January 2017.

23. Доминик Рааб, член парламента, процитировано в: J. Slack, ‘Enemies of the people: Fury over “out of touch” judges who have “declared war on democracy” by defying 17.4m Brexit voters and who could trigger constitutional crisis’, Daily Mail, 3 November 2016.

24. Daily Mail, там же, и ‘After judges’ Brexit block now your country really needs you: We MUST get out of the EU’, Daily Express, 4 November 2016.

25. Закон о Европейском союзе (Уведомление о выходе) 2017 года был внесен на рассмотрение в парламент 26 января 2017 года и принят без поправок 16 марта 2017 года.

26. J. Slack, ‘Enemies of the people: Fury over “out of touch” judges who have “declared war on democracy” by defying 17.4m Brexit vo– ters and who could trigger constitutional crisis’, Daily Mail, 3 November 2016.

27. R. (Miller & others) v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin), at [5].

28. Case of Proclamations [1610] EWHC KB J22, доступно на https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1610/J22.html

29. Там же.

30. [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin) at [108].

31. Либеральные демократы утверждают, что Конвенция Солсбери не применяется к правительствам меньшинства, см.: House of Lords Library, N. Newson, ‘Salisbury Convention in a Hung Parliament’, LLN-2017-0030, 20 June 2017, https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/LLN-2017-0030

32. V. Bogdanor (ed.), Politics and the Constitution: Essays on British Government (Dartmouth Publishing, Aldershot, 1996), p. 5.

33. Из парламентских актов 1911 и 1949 годов следует, что Палата общин может (в большинстве случаев) отменить решение Палаты лордов, если возникнет безвыходная ситуация, хотя это случается редко. Последний случай применения этих парламентских актов произошел в 2004 году, когда был принят Закон 2004 года об охоте, запрещающий охоту на диких млекопитающих с собаками.

34. До выхода Великобритании из Европейского союза наши суды должны были отменить акт парламента, если он противоречил законодательству ЕС, что было подтверждено в деле R (FactortameLtd) v. Secretary of State for Transport [1990] UKHL 7. На практике такое случалось крайне редко, и причина, по которой суды должны были это делать, заключается в том, что парламент в разделе 2(4) Закона 1972 года о Европейских сообществах принял решение сделать законодательство Европейского сообщества верховным в определенных областях.

35. J. Tapsfield, T. Sculthorpe and M. Dathan, ‘“There is NO turning back!” David Davis warns Remoaner MPs they will face the full wrath of the public if they use Supreme Court ruling to block Brexit’, Daily Mail, 24 January 2017.

36. C. de Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws (1748), Chapter 11.

37. См.: Lord Hodge, ‘Upholding the rule of law: how we preserve judicial independence in the United Kingdom’, Lincoln’s Inn Denning Society, 7 November 2016, https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-161107.pdf

38. Раздел 17 Закона 2005 года о конституционной реформе.

39. Раздел 3(1) Закона 2005 года о конституционной реформе.

40. Раздел 7(2)(а), Закон 2005 года о конституционной реформе.

41. Theresa May, ‘It’s MY job to deport foreigners who commit serious crime – and I’ll fight any judge who stands in my way, says Home Secretary’, Daily Mail, 17 February 2013, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2279828/Its-MY-job-deport-foreigners-commit-crime-Ill-fight-judgestands-way-says-Home-Secretary.html

42. Theresa May MP, House of Commons, 22 October 2013, Hansard, column 162, https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-10-22/debates/13102262000002/ImmigrationBill?highlight=Care%20 COL:% 20162

43. ‘Blair’s asylum stance “chilling”’, BBC News, 30 September 2003, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3152982.stm

44. N. Stadlen, ‘Brief Encounter: David Blunkett’, Guardian, 9 October 2006, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2006/oct/09/davidblunkett

45. R. Verkaik, ‘Judges are out of touch, says furious Blunkett’, Independent, 15 May 2003, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/judges-are-out-of-touch-says-furiousblunkett-104765.html

46. N. Stadlen, ‘Brief Encounter: David Blunkett’, Guardian, 9 October 2006.

47. ‘Is sentencing too tough?’, BBC News, 1 July 2003, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/3035512.stm

48. J. Rozenberg, ‘Judges were right to snub Blunkett’s dinner date’, Telegraph, 19 October 2006, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1531796/Judges-were-right-to-snub-Blunketts-dinner-date.html

49. N. Stadlen, ‘Brief Encounter: David Blunkett’, Guardian, 9 October 2006.

50. House of Lords Constitution Select Committee, Sixth Report 2006–7, at Chapter 2, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldselect/ldconst/151/15102.html

51. R (on the application of Miller) v. Prime Minister; Cherry & others v. Advocate General [2019] UKSC 41.

52. ‘Parliament suspension: Queen approves PM’s plan’, BBC News, 28 August 2019, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49493632

53. M. Weaver, ‘Suspending parliament not done to stifleBrexit debate, says Wallace’, Guardian, 12 September 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/12/suspending-parliament-not-shut-down-brexit-debate-ben-wallace

54. См.: David Allen Green, ‘The curious incident of the missing witness statement’, Financial Times, 6 September 2019, https://www.ft.com/content/11983298-d08e-11e9-99a4-b5ded7a7fe3f

55. ‘Kwasi Kwarteng criticised for “biased judges” comment’, BBC News, 12 September 2019, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics– 49670901

56. K. Schofield, ‘Jacob Rees-Mogg brands Supreme Court ruling a “constitutional coup” as MPs prepare to grill Boris Johnson’, PoliticsHome, 25 September 2019, https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/news/106811/jacob-rees-mogg-brands-supreme-court-ruling

57. M. Fouzder, ‘Supreme Court appointments may need MPs’ approval – Attorney General’, Law Society Gazette, 25 September 2019, https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/supreme-court-appointments-may– need-mps-approval-attorneygeneral/5101571.article

58. A. Woodcock, ‘Boris Johnson appears to contradict his own claim that parliament suspension was “nothing to do with Brexit”’, Independent, 24 September 2019, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-brexit-newslatest-supreme-court-parliament-prorogue-a9118576.html

59. J. Longworth, ‘The Supreme Court has sided with usurping Remainers over the people’, Telegraph, 24 September 2019, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/09/24/supreme-court-have-sided-usurping-remainers-people/amp/

60. A. Wickham, ‘Cabinet Ministers Are Privately Threatening A Radical Overhaul Of The Courts After The Supreme Court Brexit Judgment’, Buzzfeed News, 25 September 2019, https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/cabinet-ministers-supreme-court-brexit-decision

61. С анализом того, как и почему решение было «основано на устоявшихся конституционных принципах», можно ознакомиться здесь: Professor Mark Elliott, ‘The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (№ 2): A new approach to constitutional adjudication?’, Public Law for Everyone, 24 September 2019, https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2019/09/24/the-supreme-courts-judgment-in-cherry-millerno-2-a-new-approach-to-constitutional-adjudication/

62. ‘IAIN DUNCAN SMITH: Why it’s crucial that the judges who could decide the