Ознакомительная версия. Доступно 28 страниц из 137
Clarke M. The 1944 patulin trial of the British Medical Research Council // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2006. September. Vol. 99. № 9. P. 478–480.
D’Arcy Hart P. A change in scientific approach: from alternation to randomised allocation in clinical trials in the 1940s // BMJ. 1999. August 28. Vol. 319. № 7209. P. 572–573.
Balabanova Y., Coker R., Fedorin I., Zakharova S., Plavinskij S., Krukov N. et al. Variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among Russian clinicians and implications for screening programmes: observational study // BMJ. 2005. August 13. Vol. 331. № 7513. P. 379–382.
Regev A., Berho M., Jeffers L. J., Milikowski C., Molina E. G. et al. Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection // American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2002. Vol. 97. P. 2614–2618.
Cooperberg M. R., Chi T., Jad A., Cha I., Turek P. J. Variability in testis biopsy interpretation: implications for male infertility care in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection // Fertility and sterility. 2005. September. Vol. 84. № 3. P. 672–677.
Elmore J. G., Nelson H. D., Pepe M. S., Longton G. M. et al. Variability in pathologists’ iterpretations of individual breast biopsy slides: A population perspective // Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016. Vol. 164. № 10. P. 649–655.
Smith-Bindman R., Hosmer W. D., Caponigro M., Cunningham G. The variability in the interpretation of prenatal diagnostic ultrasound // Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2001. April. Vol. 17. № 4. P. 326–332.
Mussurakis S., Buckley D. L., Coady A. M., Turnbull L. W., Horsman A. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast // The British journal of radiology. 1996. November. Vol. 69. № 827. P. 1009–1016.
Physical defects: The pathway to correction. New York: American Child Health Association 1934.
Ayanian J. Z., Berwick D. M. Do physicians have a bias toward action? A classic study revisited // Medical Decision Making. 1991. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 154–158.
Boylston Z. An account of the small-pox inoculated in New England, upon all sorts of persons, whites, blacks and of all ages and constitutions. The Second edition. London: Printed for S. Chandler. Reprinted in Boston in NE for S. Gerrism in Cornhil and T. Hancock, 1730.
Torgerson D. J., Roberts C. Randomisation methods: concealment // BMJ. 1999. August 7. Vol. 319. № 7206. P. 375–376.
Schulz K. F. Subverting randomization in controlled trials // JAMA. 1995. November 8. Vol. 274. № 18. P. 1456–1458.
Julious S. A., Mullee M. A. Confounding and Simpson’s paradox // BMJ. 1994. December. Vol. 309. № 6967. P. 1480–1481.
Charig C. R., Webb D. R., Payne S. R., Wickham J. E. Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy // British Medical Journal. (Clinical research ed.). 1986. March 29. Vol. 292. № 6524. P. 879–882.
Kunz R., Vist G., Oxman A. D. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials // The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2007. April. Vol. 18. № 2, MR000012.
Antman K., Amato D., Wood W., Carson J., Suit H., Proppe K. et al. Selection bias in clinical trials // Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1985. August. Vol. 3. № 8. P. 1142–1147.
Vickers A. J. How to randomize // Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology. 2006. Vol. 4. № 4. P. 194–198.
Suresh K. P. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research // Journal of human reproductive sciences. 2011. January-April. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 8–11.
Beller E. M., Gebski V., Keech A. C. Randomisation in clinical trials // Medical Journal of Australia. 2002. Vol. 177. № 10. P. 565–567.
Porter T. M. The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton University Press, 1986.
Fisher R. A. The arrangement of field experiments // Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture of Great Britain. 1926. Vol. 33. P. 503–513.
Nolan D., Speed T. Stat Labs: Mathematical statistics through applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.
Fisher R. A. Mathematics of a lady tasting tea / J. R. Newman (ed.), The world of mathematics (Third Ed., 1512–1521). New York: Simon and Schuster, 1956. P. 1512–1521.
Finney D. J. Sir Ronald Fisher’s Contributions to Biometric Statistics // Biometrics. 1964. Vol. 20. № 2. P. 322–329.
Fisher R. A. The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1960.
Hróbjartsson A., Gøtzsche P. C., Gluud C. The controlled clinical trial turns 100 years: fibiger’s trial of serum treatment of diphtheria // BMJ. 1998. Vol. 317. № 7167. P. 1243–1245.
Hall N. S. R. A. Fisher and his advocacy of randomization // Journal of the history of biology. 2007. Summer. Vol. 40. № 2. P. 295–325.
Kennedy A., Torgerson D. J., Campbell M. K., Grant A. M. Subversion of allocation concealment in a randomised controlled trial: a historical case study // Trials. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 204.
Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Grimes D. A., Altman D. G. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals // JAMA. 1994. Vol. 272. № 2. P. 125–128.
Kahan B. C., Morris T. P. Reporting and analysis of trials using stratified randomisation in leading medical journals: review and reanalysis // BMJ. 2012. Vol. 345: e5840.
Ah-See K. W., Molony N. C. A qualitative assessment of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology // The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 1998. Vol. 112. № 5. P. 460–463.
Britton A., McKee M., Black N., McPherson K., Sanderson C. et al. Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review // Health Technology Assessment. 1998. October. Vol. 2. № 13.
Galton F. Statistical inquiries into the efficacy of prayer // Fortnightly Review. 1872. Vol. 12. P. 125–135.
Stigler S. M. Francis Galton’s account of the invention of correlation // Statistical Science. 1989. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 73–79.
Statistics at Square One (ninth edition, revised by M. J. Campbell, T. D. V. Swinscow). BMJ Publ. Group, London, 1996.
Stanton J. M. Galton, Pearson, and the peas: A brief history of linear regression for statistics instructors // Journal of Statistics Education. 2001. Vol. 9. № 3.
Lyon A. Why are Normal Distributions Normal? // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2014. Vol. 65. № 3. P. 621–649.
Ознакомительная версия. Доступно 28 страниц из 137
